<td id="kg486"><optgroup id="kg486"></optgroup></td>
<button id="kg486"><tbody id="kg486"></tbody></button>
<li id="kg486"><dl id="kg486"></dl></li>
  • <dl id="kg486"></dl>
  • <code id="kg486"><tr id="kg486"></tr></code>
  • Apple seeks $180m more from Samsung in patent dispute

    Dec 29, 2015

    A sales assistant uses her mobile phone next to the company logos of Apple and Samsung at a store in Hefei, Anhui province September 10, 2014. (Jianan Yu/REUTERS)

    Just over a week after Samsung paid Apple more than $548-million for infringing the patents and designs of the iPhone, Apple has asked a U.S. court to force its biggest smartphone rival to cough up even more.

    In court papers filed on Wednesday, Apple Inc said Samsung Electronics Co Ltd owes nearly $180-million in supplemental damages and interest.

    These further damages relate to five Samsung devices that infringed Apple’s patents and were sold after a 2012 jury verdict finding Samsung liable in the dispute.

    Representatives for Samsung and Apple could not immediately be reached for comment.

    The long-running dispute dates back to 2011, when Apple sued Samsung alleging the South Korean electronics company violated its patents and copied the look of the iPhone. After the 2012 verdict, Samsung was ordered to pay $930-million to Apple.

    In May a U.S. appeals court stripped about $382-million from that total, saying Cupertino, California-based Apple could not protect the phone’s appearance through trademarks. Samsung paid Apple the bulk of the judgment, $548.2-million, on Dec. 14.

    In a case that has come to epitomize the global smartphone war, Apple and Samsung have more battles ahead. Another trial over remaining damages related to the appeals court decision is set to go ahead next March in San Jose, California federal court.

    Samsung has also appealed the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. The company said Apple was compensated far more than it deserved for patents on designs of the iPhone’s front face, bezel and application icons. The high court must first decide whether or not to accept the case for review.

    The case is Apple Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 11-cv-1846.

    Source: THE GLOBE AND MAIL


    Copyright ? 2017, G.T. Internet Information Co.,Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲麻豆精品果冻传媒| 国产一级高清免费观看| 久久99精品久久| 狠狠色综合网久久久久久| 国产精品v片在线观看不卡| 中文字幕第十页| 永久免费无码网站在线观看| 国产日韩欧美不卡在线二区| 中文在线天堂网www| 欧美欧洲性色老头老妇| 国产亚洲日韩在线a不卡| a毛片久久免费观看| 日韩在线第一区| 光棍天堂在线视频| 韩国美女vip福利一区| 成全视频在线观看在线播放高清| 亚洲深深色噜噜狠狠爱网站| 被夫上司连续侵犯七天终于| 在线视频第二页| 久久国产精品亚洲一区二区| 爽好大快深点一视频| 国产免费一区二区三区不卡| hxsp777.com| 日本精品一卡二卡≡卡四卡| 亚洲视频日韩视频| 贵妇的变态yin乱| 国产边打电话边被躁视频| 中文字幕日韩精品一区二区三区| 欧美日韩国产综合在线| 国产123在线观看| 思99热精品久久只有精品| 性xxxfreexxxx性欧美| 亚洲AV午夜成人片| 爱情岛讨论坛线路亚洲高品质| 国产又爽又黄又无遮挡的激情视频| 99精品人妻无码专区在线视频区| 日日噜噜夜夜爽爽| 亚洲人成片在线观看| 福利一区在线视频| 国产亚洲福利精品一区二区| 2018天天弄|